Christopher Hitchens & Tony Blair Debate on Religion

In a civilized and thought-provoking debate that took place just this past week in Toronto, former British Prime Minister and recent Catholic convert Tony Blair defended the motion that religion is a force for good in the world. Opposing the motion with all his cerebral might was his compatriot, the journalist and public intellectual Christopher Hitchens.

As the eager audience seems to have correctly anticipated, the intellectual engagement was stimulating, challenging and amusing. Best of all, Hitchens and Blair both managed to steer away from cheap shots, ad hominem attacks and appeals to emotion (for the most part...). Their mutual respect for one another helped their arguments focus on the relevance of the ideas supporting their position, and the result was a highly entertaining and educational exchange.

Whatever side you agree with, you're in for a mental treat.



Check out more fascinating debates.
.

The Awesomest Sentence I Read Today

I've totally neglected this type of blog entry for a while, but maybe now I'll get it started again. Anyway, this is from an essay on gay rights, written by Jonathan Rauch, quoting James Q. Wilson:
Of all the institutions through which men may pass--schools, factories, the military--marriage has the largest [domesticating] effect.

Rauch then argues that the domestication of men ought to be one of the top three social functions of marriage. Wow...
.

Irreducible Complexity Cut Down to Size

Unless you live in hillbilly territory, it's difficult nowadays to be a creationist and not get immediately laughed at. So, what do you do if you believe in the half-baked idea that some designer designed biological organisms as they are? You dress it up with sophisticated-sounding technical terms like 'irreducible complexity', and you also make sure to surround its mention with liberal-sounding principles like tolerance of other views, teaching the controversy, keeping an open mind, or even --and this is as ridiculous as it can possibly get-- letting the children decide, as if empirical knowledge were a question of personal preference or popularity...

The fact is, however, that once you strip the intention behind irreducible complexity (lest you commit the circumstantial ad hominem fallacy), the idea, fancy as it may originally sound, is still ultimately nothing more than an argument from personal incredulity: taking your own inability to explain a phenomenon or process, or your lack of imagination, or simply your ignorance of the scientific literature, as the basis upon which to pretend to have found an answer that's just conveniently consistent with your religious beliefs.

And when it comes to evidence, even the examples shown by its proponents turn out, surprise surprise, not to be irreducibly complex...



And just remember that if you want to draw an analogy between a human designer and god as a designer, logical consistency requires that in both cases the designers must be more complex than their designs, in which case you'd be 'explaining' complexity by presupposing even more complexity.

Call me silly, but 'solving' a mystery with a bigger mystery only aggravates the problem, it doesn't solve it...

And if you're interested, here is a description of the self-assembly of the bacterial flagellum.

Update: QualiaSoup, the creator of this and other wonderful animations, has also produced a response to 'objections' creationists have voiced against his portrayal of irreducible complexity:



As one commenter said, you don't fuck with QualiaSoup :)
.

Neolin: A Study In Syncretism

Decades before the 'Trail of Tears' in the Age of Jackson - even prior to the American Revolution - the relationship between Native Americans and the men and women of largely European descent who would call themselves 'Americans' was one of compromise and conflict. From 1607 to 1750, conflict was by no means paramount in the relationship between the white man and the North American Indian. Trade, scientific and cultural exchanges and a significant number of intermarriages cemented harmonious relationships from Virginia to Florida.
.
By the mid-eighteenth century, however, the rapid influx of land-hungry European settlers, of whom neither the French nor the British could constrain on the frontier, resulted in rampant abuses against the indigenous peoples. In response, several Indian leaders emerged to challenge these unchecked encroachments. Neolin, a member of the Delaware tribe in close proximity to the Ohio River, rallied his people in most unusual terms for a Native American.
.
Rather than speaking words within the confines of Indian spirituality, Neolin exhorted his people - in Western terms - to separate themselves economically, socially and politically from the European interlopers to reclaim their lost liberty. In regard to assessing blame, Neolin was quite clear. While the Europeans had demonstrated indifference and cupidity, members of the tribes had allowed them to disrupt their way of life. Where they once had governed the land and relations among themselves with the blessing of heaven, the Indians, now living lives steeped in foreign material goods and alcohol, had turned away from the gift of the creator.
.
In using a theological paradigm inclusive of heaven, hell, sin and redemption, Neolin, somewhat unknowingly, was expressing the culmination of historically fused modes of Christianity and Native American religion. His rejection of Western values, as he viewed them from bitter experience, was paradoxically made on an ideological paradigm of semi-Western construction.
.
Neolin provides an excellent example of how culture, language and ideology can meld in complex and meaningful ways between divergent peoples. As such, his life and syncretic thought can be considered a frame for current studies of globalization.
.
(Picture: Neolin)
.
J Roquen

What time is it?

As I get older, I find myself interested in traditional Christian practices. This year I've been particularly observing the liturgical calendar. When I visited St. John's Abbey during Lent, I learned what that season meant to them. Lent was followed by Holy Week, Easter, and Pentecost; then the part of the year referred to as "Ordinary Time." Today marks the beginning of Advent, which kicks off the second major center of "Sacred Time" (Advent, Christmas and Epiphany).

The focus of Advent is spiritual preparation for the celebration of Jesus' birth. The traditional "Christmas season" does not actually begin until Christmas Eve. Advent is supposed to be a somber season that increases in expectation and hope with each day approaching the arrival of the Messiah that is celebrated at Christmas.

We gathered together all the Advent paraphernalia at home: the wreath, three different calendars (two of which are hand-made), and weekly prayers. I hope this will become a new family tradition. We explained Natalie's role to her last night. She is already excited to blow out the "birthday" candles!

Happy Thanksgiving, From Your Colon

As you sit down to celebrate today's festivities, remember that everything you shove in your pie hole has to come out somewhere :)



Happy Thanksgiving, everyone!
.

No Ancients this week

We're going to have another crack at the Polymos Napoleonic rules this week - so the Spanish will have to wait another week before repelling the Carthaginians from their sacred homeland.

However, it will give us a chance to use the Flat Hills in anger and see how they stand up to usage (cannonballs, marching troops, horses riding all over them etc.) and I'll take my camera so you can have a butchers on how they play.  If you don't mind looking at 6mm Napoleonic figures!

Its a busy week next week.  I've got to prepare for a second interview but also have some jobs in the pipeline that I need to sort out so there will be a lot of juggling - but I'm sure we'll find time to roll some dice!

Bonnie & Clyde

I rented a Gainsbourg cd from the library, and heard this song;


It sparked something in me.
I was surprised I've never read up on these depression-era outlaws before...
pretty interesting stuff.

I read this;


found some photos of this good-looking, well-dressed pair...



They met over hot chocolate.
Some say she was making it for a mutual friend when Clyde came over.
Others say hot chocolate was Clyde's specialty.





Bonnie had a pet rabbit (meant to give to her mom)
named Sonny Boy who lived in their car.



Clyde Barrow -







Bonnie Parker -



She was charming, well read, film obsessed, and wrote poetry.




Her favorite food was red beans and rice.
Because their phones were taps,
her family would communicate in code over the line.
If her mom said "I've got some red beans and rice on the stove",
it would mean; there's going to be a meetup with Bonnie soon.



"Tell them I don't smoke cigars."
(in this infamous photo, she's kiddin around)

she smoked camels;



She was married to another man,
and was still wearing their wedding ring when she died.



She had two requests for her mother;
to be buried next to Clyde, and not to say anything bad about him.
Neither was carried out.

Can't wait to see this movie -





Faye won an oscar for this.



It was Gene Hackman's big break.






Denis Dutton - A Darwinian Theory of Beauty

One of the most difficult topics to explore and think about in philosophy has to do with questions of aesthetics. If we ignore boring and annoying platitudes like 'beauty is in the eye of the beholder' (and I swear I'll strangle the next time person who recites this tired cliché), the question of what beauty is turns out to be exceedingly difficult to explain/define. Personally, I've done my best to avoid pretending I have anything interesting to say about the subject...

Philosopher Denis Dutton, however, thinks that he has found a possible answer: the Darwinian mechanisms of natural and sexual selection can offer the promise of guiding us in the direction of a general theory of beauty: where it comes from, why we experience it the way we do, as well as what kinds of things we could predict to have aesthetic value. He spells out some of these ideas in the following animated TEDTalk presentation:



Man, these animations are getting better and better :)

Although it sounds appealing in some respects, I can't be sure that Dutton's theory is any more than one of those 'just-so-stories' that one can conjure up to 'explain' some range of phenomena.

While I'm skeptical of it, I however, I do find it interesting and worth exploring further. I might just have to read his book...
.

nectar of venus

I made the best fricking caramel sauce ever!
Then I drizzled it over the tops of fresh bakes vegan pumpkin pecan muffins.

They are XXX good. All gooey and orgasmic.
Don't they look sexy and satisfied?





The basic recipe is in julia's cookbook.

1 cup sugar
1/3 cup water

simmer, swirling around sauce pan until clear.
cover and boil until thick and dark brown.
swirl until light brown.
cool pan in cold water.

warm up again.
stir in 1cup heavy cream
(for which i substituted with whipped 1/4 cup butter + 3/4 cup soymilk)
cool while stirring
add 2tsp vanilla
and 2dashes salt.

Ssssoooooooooo good.
I couldnt stop laughing and saying "mmmmm!"
I'm calling the sauce Nectar of Venus.

I've got a cup of it in the fridge.
I'll pop it in the oven to melt it.
Can't wait to try it on raspberry sorbet!

Obama Outlines Moral, Philosophical Justifications for Turkey Pardon

Remember that time Scooter Libby dressed up as a giant turkey and got a presidential pardon from G.W. Bush? You might have thought of such an act as the epitome of political corruption and sleaziness... but not all pardons are political acts of self-interest, and sometimes doing the right thing, especially if you're Obama, requires that you set aside political considerations and poll rankings, and just get down to the business of non-partisan righteousness :)



Check more Onion funny stuff.
.

Robert Krulwich - Why Can't We Walk Straight?

Imagine standing blindfolded on an open field and being told to walk in a straight line for a considerable distance. Could you do it?

Of course, any hypothetical answer about our own abilities is likely to be biased, wrong and completely unjustified, so the way to really try to answer this question is by testing it, and being the highly visual creatures that we are, it turns out, when we can't see where we're going, we humans can't help but start walking in circles. Robert Krulwich reports:



Now, you might have a hypothesis as to why this happens, but your hypothesis has most likely already been tested and shown to be wrong:



Any other guesses? And how would you test for them?
.

Airport Security and How to Make the Holidays Less Lonely

There has been a huge outcry recently over the new security measures being implemented on American airports. Thanks to douchebags like the guy who tried to conceal a bomb in his underwear, it may now become standard procedure for a TSA agent to cop a feel whenever you want to fly... for national security purposes, of course.

Now, before we start ranting about the obvious violation of privacy these security measure represent, let's remember, as Saturday Night Live does, that by banning such measures, we may be discriminating against a significant (and perhaps lonely) segment of the population...



And if you can't afford to fly, or wouldn't mind taking care of business yourself, you might as well get in shape in the comfort of your own home :)




Check out more funnies from SNL.
.

Spider Dance


Natalie is crazy about this page on Pendleton Ward's website. It's just a simple animated walking sequence with a soundtrack of like six chiptunes. And yet she demands to watch it over and over again. This has replaced YouTube videos of Hello Kitty as her laptop entertainment of choice.

The hills are alive...

...with the sound of glueing.

I'm making steady progress on the 'flat' hills.  I've done the first two lots of 3" wide hills and am in the process of gluing the flocked paper onto the next set of two 4" side hills.


This is the process I've been following.  I mark out the shapes required on 12" square mdf (6mm deep).  These all finish at set widths (2", 3" and 4") and so will fit easily together.  I then cut them with a jig saw.

I then overlay the cut MDF onto the back of the flocked paper and mark the conours - then cut with a knife.  Then I PVA the MDF and glue the cut shape to the requisite piece of cut MDF.  Then just apply pressure (lay something heavy over the top) and leave for an hour or so.



Then trim any excess paper (there shouldn't be much!) and then stack them as required.

In the above pic you can see two straight edged pieces.  Put these together (straight edges meeting in the middle) to form a ridge or base of a hill 6" wide.

Then place a further 3" wide piece on top to make your hill OR to make your ridge higher.


The pieces in use.  The two straight edged pieces have been joined together to make a gentle hill (with the Romans clearly on the hill and the Gauls not on the hill - so the Romans have the advantage.



Now with the extra 3" piece added, it makes a steep hill.  Both units are on the hill but its clearer now who holds the advantage (the Romans at the crest, the Gauls lower down) so the Romans still hold the upper hand.

Note that all units sit nicely on the piece without slipping off (as we've experienced with sloped hills).  But its the modular effect I'm really happy with.  We play Napoleonic rules as well as ancients and often re-fight historical battles.  Trying to replicate the terrain in the past has been troublesome, but with this system it will be a piece of cake.  The same should apply to historical battles and provide more flexibility and realism for future battles.

So the items can easily fit together to form a different terrain feature - such as a raised plateau or a gully / long ridge etc.


A raised plateau!  Just happens to be square but you can barely make out the joins.  Barely.

The Thanksgiving Crisis Of 1939

Thanksgiving is almost upon America. While few women in their twenties can find the kitchen - let alone cook, a significant number of wives, mothers, grandmothers (or women in all three roles) will still wake up at an ungodly hour (about 4:00AM) to throw the turkey in the oven, clean the house and begin preparing the side dishes. Sweet potatoes, mashed potatoes, green beans and lest we not forget dessert - apple and pumpkin pie. Along with these women, a larger and larger cadre of men are now taking part in what was once strictly women's terrain. The person saying 'Get out of my kitchen' these days may very well be the husband rather than the wife. As a larger percentage of men have been refused gainful employment by their society (shall we say economically emasculated?), these underemployed Y chromosome types can take some solace in being able to do what used to be a woman's job. Back in 1939, men were almost completely helpless in the kitchen. Cooking was synonymous with the female head of household. Of course, the man was officially considered the head of household by society at large, but everyone knew - even in the early twentieth century - where the real power lied.
.
Now that we're warmed up intellectually on the subject of Thanksgiving. It is time to serve the main course of this article. As you may remember, either by living or historically, Franklin Delano Roosevelt was the US president for most of the 1930s. At the height of the Great Depression in 1933, a funny thing happened. At some point during the year, a few people noticed that Thanksgiving, which had been celebrated on the last Thursday of November since Lincoln's proclamation of the holiday in 1863, was to fall on the 30th - the last day of the month. Realizing that the period for Christmas shopping would be much shorter than usual, some business leaders asked FDR to fix Thanksgiving one week earlier on the 23rd in order for businesses to turn a greater profit and perhaps hire more people at a time of economic crisis. Roosevelt, who had far too much on his plate (pardon the pun) in trying to pass needed legislation through Congress to save the country from economic ruin, dismissed the request.
.
Six years later, the exact same thing happened yet again. This time, however, Roosevelt opted to change the holiday to the 23rd to allow for a longer Christmas present-buying season to stimulate the economy. Now, keep in mind that Nazi Germany had attacked Poland on 1 September without provocation and was threatening to continue its conquests, but is that what America was talking about? Well, yes to some degree. Everyone, however, seemed to have something to say about Roosevelt's announcement on the re-scheduling of Thanksgiving. One of the first businesses to express their dismay was The Richman Brothers. Here is their thesis from an actual telegram that they sent to the White House via Western Union on 13 October 1933.
.
'As America's largest clothing manufacturer, we desire to express our emphatic protest against the selfish attempt of a small group of stores to change the date of the Thanksgiving day.'
.
If big businesses were worried about losing money to small businesses due to the change of Thanksgiving, small businesses had the exact same concerns. Consider this letter to Roosevelt on 15 August from Arnold's Hat Shop in Brooklyn, New York.
.
'The small store keeper would prefer leaving Thanksgiving Day where it belongs. If the large department stores are overcrowded during the shorter shopping period, before Christmas, the overflow will come, naturally, to the neighborhood store.'
.
Hence, large and small businesses - at least in some cases - perceived Roosevelt's Thanksgiving decision would adversely effect their sales in favor of the other. Both contentions, of course, cannot be true at the same time.
.
What about the calendar makers? Was Roosevelt planning to make a similar decision in 1940? The Budget Press of Salem, Ohio was certainly chagrined in their letter to the president written on 15 August.
.
'I am afraid your Thanksgiving is going to cause the calendar manufacturers untold grief. If very many customers demand 1940 calendars to correspond with your proclamation, hundreds of thousands of dollars will be lost by the calendar companies, and in many instances it will result in bankruptcy.'
.
Apparently, the author of the Budget Press letter did not think Americans would be satisfied in simply crossing out 'Thanksgiving' on the 30th and writing the holiday in on the 23rd.
.
Roosevelt's proclamation was ignored by several states. State houses across America entertained long debates and issued highly critical responses to the President's decision. Connecticut was one of the dissenting states and planned to celebrate Thanksgiving on the 30th as originally scripted. If you happened to be at college in New York, where Thanksgiving was being held on the 23rd, and a resident of Connecticut, where the holiday was still to be celebrated on the 30th, you would have a definite scheduling conflict on your hands. This was the case of one Eleanor Lucy Blydenburgh. Probably no more than 22 or 23 years old, her letter to FDR, written on 18 October 1939 from Brooklyn, is quite touching.
.
'Your recent decision to change the date of our Thanksgiving Day has just taken effect here at the Pratt Institute. Our directors announced that our school vacation would begin on the 23rd of November and last until the 26th because New York, being your home state, is abiding by your decision. However, where I come from, Connecticut, they'll be observing it on the 30th of November as usual. Really, this situation makes my heart ache because I love the Thanksgiving Holidays as much if not a bit more than our Christmas holidays.
.
Oh, I've missed another Thanksgiving at home with my parents because I was away at college and too far away to get home to celebrate with them and I didn't like being away at the time either but I see this is going to happen again.'
.
On that poignant note of love and family, Kleostoday wishes you and yours a very Happy Thanksgiving - wherever you are in the world.
.
(Photo: A dapper Franklin Roosevelt cuts into a Thanksgiving turkey as wife Eleanor looks on)
.
J Roquen

Viva Espana! Spanish ready for battle

Apart from the commanders, the Spanish army is now ready for battle. 

Here they are!

Skirmishers - Balearic slingers and caetrati (javelinmen)


Medium Foot - Iberian scutarii and Luisitanians



Heavy foot - Celtiberian scutarii



Cavalry - Large shield cavalry and small shield light horse


Sorry about the photos.  Still trying to get the camera screen fixed!  But you get the general idea.

10,000 views!


I don't know when it happened, but my blog went through the 10k barrier this week.  Its a big milestone for me and I'm very humble / pleased to have reached it.

A big thanks to everyone who has viewed the blog - both Followers and passers by.

I'll try to keep up the good work - I'll be publising over the weekend with the finished Ancient Spanish army, my MDF rolling hills and a first look at the Parthians.

Thanks again!

Phil

It's begnning to look a lot like christmas!














We've had a move round in the shop and have created a frame wall in which to advertise the prints we sell. This month's theme is of course Christmas! Above are some of the designs.